Re: FVWM: Retry... still some fvwm problem to signalize for me.

From: Charles Hines <>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:16:05 -0500

>>>>> "Rob" == Robert Tarrall <tarrall_at_solarz.Colorado.EDU> writes:

Rob> "N. Dan Zou" wrote:
-> Agreed, fvwm has a lot of potential, but it still has some rough edges.
-> I hope we can smooth out those rough edges before a public release.

Rob> Hmmm... seems a heck of a lot smoother than most "fully released"
Rob> window managers I've used (olwm, twm, 4Dwm, and their virtual-screen
Rob> brethren). I think at this point the main problem is getting all
Rob> the features fully explained to the users... :-)

That is the real problem. Fvwm will always have rough edges, but the
docs definitely needed (and still need) expanding.

I think that there will only be like one more release before the first
official one. It'll fix a few more buglets, improve the docs a little
bit more, fixup the install process just a hair more, and it should be
about as ready as ever to be official. Then the real fun starts...

Chuck
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Thu Mar 07 1996 - 08:16:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:58 BST