On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:40:13PM +0200, Rastislav Galia wrote:
> > What I have in mind is a release that we can point at that isn't
> > two years old. I am planning to spend less time before the 2.6
> > release anyway. I will definitely not push it if it isn't
> > stabilizing fast enough.
>
> Does spending less time mean fvwm development if canceled ?
No, I was comparing the time between 2.2 and 2.4 (2.5 years) with
the time between 2.4 and 2.6 (hopefully < 2 years).
It means that 2.4 development got out of hand and that I want to
retain better control over release dates. 2.3.x was in feature
freeze for about a year. That must not happen again.
> And - I thought 2.6 will be stable version final 2.5 unstable.
Yes.
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt, mail: dominik.vogt_at_schlund.de, phone: 0721/91374-382
Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Wed Sep 18 2002 - 08:23:10 BST