On 05 Apr 2002 10:11:08 +1000, Felix Karpfen wrote:
>
> I am looking at the possibility of using the "stow" <program|routines>
> for future compiles from source. But I do not think that fvwm2 is a
> good candidate for experiments of this sort.
I never used stow, but it should work.
> This would be negated if fvwm2 needs more of GNOME than is currently
> installed. So this email is just a doublecheck that the output of
> "configure" can safely be taken at their face value.
You can.
> > You might want to make sure you build in the location of your icons
> > so you don't need to put ImagePath in your .fvwm2rc.
> >
> I will work out what that advice means in due course. The config.log has
> one line to say that it has checked the imagepath.
Once you forge ahead to icons you will need either to specify fully
qualified file names or use ImagePath or configure --with-imagepath=PATH.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Fri Apr 05 2002 - 15:41:50 BST