Dominik Vogt <dominik_vogt_at_hp.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:49:12PM -0500, bgiaccio_at_psrw.com wrote:
> > Didn't this come up once before around the time of the num_lock problem, I
> seem to recall Dominik, coming up with somethin, could someone else check the
> archive I don't have a netscape handy right now.
>
> We don't really know what the source of this key binding problems
> are/were since the reporters didn't react to my mails. I don't
> even know if we in fact *had* a num-lock problem.
My memory on this is we NEVER had a numlock problem. The numlock
modifier works as we would expect. (Although, perhaps as someone else
might not expect.) We did have a 2.1.7 modifier problem. (No
modifiers worked.) This has since been corrected.
> Dominik
>
> --
> Dominik Vogt, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Dept. BVS
--
Dan Espen
444 Hoes Lane Room RRC 1C-214 E-mail: dane_at_mk.bellcore.com
Piscataway, NJ 08854 Phone: (732) 699-5570
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://fvwm.math.uh.edu/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Tue Feb 02 1999 - 12:08:47 GMT