Brady Montz <bradym_at_cs.arizona.edu> writes:
> "Vlad D. Markov" <markov_at_monmouth.com> writes:
>
> > I appreciate Fvwm's small memory consumption and speed. My computer is
> > an old 486 DX66. I prefer not to bring up an interpreter to do common
> > tasks. I hope Fvwm does not get bloated.
>
> I agree. That's why I made the point (and will make again) that we should
have
> at most one interpreter running. I negelected to say that fvwm should work
> perfectly nicely without having an interpreter built in as well. That's also
a
> prerequisite I would want satisfied.
And I agree too, even though I have plenty of memory.
One could argue that fvwm already have an interpreter built-in! This
interpreter takes up some 200 lines of code. A TCL interpreter takes
up 4000 lines (I believe) and can usually be loaded as a shared
library. And if you use anything like tkman, tkgoodstuff or similar,
you already have that shared library loaded...
/tonny
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Fri May 01 1998 - 00:36:12 BST