Re: FVWM: Re: Release 2.1

From: Charles Durst <cdurst_at_world.std.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 23:53:41 -0400

> I think it's about time we decided on what the F in FVWM stands for, since
> it's been in doubt ever since fvwm 0.9 something, when it was no longer
> considered "feeble" :)

My 3 cents ...

I think the GNU recursive-acronym joke is getting a little tired.

I agree with the folks who don't feel the need to make it stand for
anything.

How about actively making it stand for nothing?

If we can have an "X" window system, or a "C" programming language, why
not an "F" Virtual Window Manager?

--
			      .-------------------------------------.
Charles Durst                 |  Email: cdurst_at_world.std.com        |
			      `-------------------------------------'
--
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.

Received on Mon Oct 23 1995 - 22:57:15 GMT