FVWM: Re: Unofficial debian package for 2.5.8

From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta_at_acm.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:37:30 -0600

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:41:46 +0000, Mikhael Goikhman <migo_at_homemail.com> said:

> On 11 Nov 2003 16:24:07 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> I would be happy if people took my patches.

> You are welcome to send patches that improve the deb package we
> provide. However if you speak about hooks and other ancient things,
> I see them as a clear deterioration. This will not be applied. The
> configuration in your patch are so ancient (from 5-7 years ago?)
> that it makes no sence to start to fix it. It should be dropped. We
> already provide 2 sets of configurations for a user without any
> fvwm2rc. Maintaining more configurations that are also distribution
> specific is meaningless.

        I am not wedded to the configuration examples. If that is your
 sole objection, then it is easl=ily fixed.

> We also don't add any distribution specific legacy things to our
> rpms. The binary packages from developers are clean and include
> only the things installed on a regular "make install". With addition
> of all mandatory stuff to pass the package requirements and minor
> usability things.

        Are we still speaking of the examples?

        I note that the packages provided do not integrate well into
 Debian's menu system, nor do they integrate with the alternatives
 system; and, off hand, I do not see a system wide default fvwmrc. Are
 these the legacy things you refer to? If so, I am afraid that the
 packages provided by Debian must remain diverged; some of these are
 required by the need to present an consistent integration of window
 managers into Debian.

        I am not the official maintainer of FVWM in Debian, but I'll
 try and see if I can get him to cede the apckage to me, when I'll
 have greater control over the default configuration.

        manoj
-- 
'Twas the nocturnal segment of the diurnal period preceding the annual
Yuletide celebration, And throughout our place of residence, Kinetic
activity was not in evidence among the possessors of this potential,
including that species of domestic rodent known as Mus
musculus. Hosiery was meticulously suspended from the forward edge of
the woodburning caloric apparatus, Pursuant to our anticipatory
pleasure regarding an imminent visitation from an eccentric
philanthropist among whose folkloric appelations is the honorific
title of St. Nicklaus ...
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta_at_acm.org>  <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Thu Nov 13 2003 - 01:42:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:55 BST