On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 08:43:40AM +0100, fvwm wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:25:41AM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:04:00AM +0100, dominik.vogt_at_gmx.de wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:35:33PM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> > >>On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 03:10:19PM +0100, Jan Johansson wrote:
> > >>>This has changed between 2.4.8 and 2.4.14.
> > >>>
> > >>>When using 'Style * NoIcon' (or NoIconTitle) iconified windows
> > >>>no longer show up in FvwmIconMan.
> > >>
> > >Sorry, I can not confirm this. The default resolution is 'page'
> > >at least since 2.4.0 was released, and probably since 2.2.0 too
> > >(I did not check this). Something else must have changed in your
> > >setup.
> >
> > First, I am a happy camper. The change whatever made me find the
> > Resolution setting and it solved another annoyance. But if you
> > think this is a bug I will do my best to help you find it.
> >
> > My diff[1] indicated that the Resolution default had changed. Now
> > I see that if was a manpage update and not an actual change.
> >
> > For thease tests I have two windows. One xconsole that is
> > iconified and a xterm.
> >
> > With 2.4.8 the Resolution setting makes no difference.
> > FvwmIconMan always shows. (X is a minicon).
> > [ xterm ]
> > [X xconsole]
> >
> > With 2.4.14 I get this result.
> >
> > Undefined Resolution.
> > [ xterm ]
> >
> > Resolution: Global
> > [ xterm ]
> > [X xconsole]
> >
> > Resolution: Desk
> > [ xterm ]
> > [X xconsole]
> >
> > Resolution: Page
> > [ xterm ]
> >
> > Resolution: Screen
> > [ xterm ]
> >
> > Full fvwm2rc.m4 is available at [2].
> >
> > [1] http://www.isk.kth.se/~janj/fvwm2-diff
> > [2] http://www.isk.kth.se/~janj/fvwm2rc.m4
>
> Nope, your config does not help either. There is nothing
> indicating such a change in the diffs, and regardless whether I
> use 2.4.0, 2.4.8, 2.4.16 or cvs, the default is and was always
> page resolution. The problem must come from your specific system.
> Thins to check:
>
> - Is the right config file executed?
> - Is the right fvwm executable used?
> - Are the modules the ones that were compiled with the fvwm core?
Ah, finally I understand your problem. I think the position of
the 'icon' had random values without an icon on the desktop.
Should be fixed now. Please check whether this happened with
2.5.6 too and whether it's gone in the latest CVS code.
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Wed Mar 12 2003 - 04:17:27 GMT