Re: FVWM: FvwmPager goes crazy?

From: Gert Brinkmann <g111_at_netcologne.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:40:29 +0100

Thanks for your explanation, Dominik.

phew... complicated... What does "obscure" mean in window manager
context? Checking a dictionary did not return sensefull results. So,
what is the difference between "not (fully) visible" and "(partially)
obscured"?

All the cases that you did describe are ok to send such an event, but
none of these cover the situation i did mean: When moving the
pager-screen around with at everytime completely *not* showing the page
where mozilla is opened, mozilla should not get such an event, isn't it?
Only if a mozilla window was not (fully) visible and at one time becomes
more visible than before, it needs to redraw and so requires such an
event, as i understand.

But Dan allready said that this might be fixed sometime. It is certainly
of priority C, IMO. (The only thing is that this
mouse-button-3-scrolling in the pager did arouse my interest for fvwm,
because it gave me a totally new feeling of a real huge virtual screen.
But there are enough other interesting things to be found in fvwm...)

Gert


--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Thu Feb 27 2003 - 14:20:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:54 BST