On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Now I come to think of it, a likely culprit is the mailing list software.
> Perhaps MIME is a bad way of distributing patches? What about uuencoded
> patches instead?
Maybe it's YOUR (hence ownership) software. I've never had a problem with
MIME encoded stuff on a mailing list. If you're getting errors in the
reported size, maybe you should check to see (with netscape) what the
message on the archive looks like. Netscape should see the nice mime
ttachment.
-peace
--- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK ------------+-----------
GAT d- s:+ !a C+(+++) UI/L/S/B++(+++) | "In the morning glad I see
P>+ L+(++) E---- W+++ N+ o? K? w++++ | My foe outstrech'd beneath the tree."
O--- M-- V PS+++_at_ PE Y-- PGP+ t++ 5 | -The Poison Tree
X++ R- tv+ b DI++ D+ G e>* h*(!) r- | William Blake
y*(+) ------ END GEEK CODE BLOCK -----+
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Thu Aug 28 1997 - 17:49:42 BST