FVWM: code base merge for fvwm95?

From: Robert Nicholson <robert_at_elastica.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 23:04:00 -0400 (EDT)

I'm guessing that the 95 hack is so much of a hack that to integrate
the sources back into the main distribution would upset the purists?

I'm new to fvwm95 and I was just curious about the fvwm position on
it?

I've already noticed that fvwm95 seems to be out on it's own so to
speak and I'm wondering what's the best to commit time and resources
to. I do like the way fvwm2's .fvwm2rc file is split with the Read's
which don't appear to have made their way into the fvwm95 release I'm
currently using.

So, will these two source trees be disjoint?

Why for instance can't the 95 hack be a module of fvwm2?

Go easy on me :-)
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Mon Oct 21 1996 - 22:00:37 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:59 BST