[clip]
>
> RATS.
>
> does anyone use negative desk numbers?
> I know, desks are generated on the fly, but I really don't use this one, so
> I can't say anything about it.
>
> I'm rather satisfied with my single desk of 4x2 pages :-) (I prefer that to
> more desks, since I change pages with the mouse most often, either crossing
> borders, or clicking in the pager - which just shows my one desk)
>
>
> the negative thingie also spoils my main argument for a combined/unified
> interface:
> It isn't really an x/y/z address, which goes from the origin (0/0/0) to
> (inf/inf/inf)
>
> So if we unified the interface, would someone specify Page -3 -3 ?
> what should happen in this case?
>
> is it possible to also extend pages to +-inf ?
> does it make any sense to have that many pages / desks?
>
[clip]
I personally would vote for deletion of the negative virtual desk numbers.
To me, all it does is add confusion. If 4 billion virtual desks are
really necessary, lets use an unsigned 32-bit int.
Dan Niles
dan_at_more.net
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Tue Apr 30 1996 - 14:35:41 BST